<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Retro Review: TMNT &#8211; Turtles in Time Re-Shelled</title>
	<atom:link href="http://Golgotron.com/2010/03/retro-review-tmnt-turtles-in-time-re-shelled/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://Golgotron.com/2010/03/retro-review-tmnt-turtles-in-time-re-shelled/</link>
	<description>Eat the Gtron, bitches!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 08:46:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: QuizMaster</title>
		<link>http://Golgotron.com/2010/03/retro-review-tmnt-turtles-in-time-re-shelled/#comment-620</link>
		<dc:creator>QuizMaster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 19:48:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://golgotron.com/?p=4150#comment-620</guid>
		<description>Jorge, do you mean TMNT Forever, the movie which was a cartoon cross-over between 1980&#039;s TMNT and 2000&#039;s TMNT?  That was hella sweet.

As for this Re-shelling business, they couldn&#039;t even get the &quot;My toe!  My toe!&quot; sound right.  So disappointing.... especially since Geeeoff hit the nail on the head by pointing out that this was finally a title which is near and dear to my heart.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jorge, do you mean TMNT Forever, the movie which was a cartoon cross-over between 1980&#8242;s TMNT and 2000&#8242;s TMNT?  That was hella sweet.</p>
<p>As for this Re-shelling business, they couldn&#8217;t even get the &#8220;My toe!  My toe!&#8221; sound right.  So disappointing&#8230;. especially since Geeeoff hit the nail on the head by pointing out that this was finally a title which is near and dear to my heart.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jorge!</title>
		<link>http://Golgotron.com/2010/03/retro-review-tmnt-turtles-in-time-re-shelled/#comment-619</link>
		<dc:creator>Jorge!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 22:15:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://golgotron.com/?p=4150#comment-619</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s also issues with who owns rights to which characters. Laird/Eastman sold all rights to Nickelodeon, but thre is some speculation that some characters, IE Bebob/Rocksteady, are owned by a different company altogether. If you are big fans of the franchise, you should watch the last tv movie they did. It was really a freaking love letter to the fans.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s also issues with who owns rights to which characters. Laird/Eastman sold all rights to Nickelodeon, but thre is some speculation that some characters, IE Bebob/Rocksteady, are owned by a different company altogether. If you are big fans of the franchise, you should watch the last tv movie they did. It was really a freaking love letter to the fans.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geeeoff</title>
		<link>http://Golgotron.com/2010/03/retro-review-tmnt-turtles-in-time-re-shelled/#comment-618</link>
		<dc:creator>Geeeoff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 19:14:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://golgotron.com/?p=4150#comment-618</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t have anything to say to this other than I totally agree. I guess in a world where everything is getting remade or &quot;rebooted,&quot; I&#039;ve finally come across a title that&#039;s near and dear to my (as well as a lot of gamers) heart. I played through to the prehistoric level to fight the gelatinous creature instead of Slash and was immediately turned off. Now, having done some research, I discovered that the SNES version that I grew up playing was actually pretty radically different from the Arcade Version, which I never had the chance to play. Turns out, Slash, the boss from the prehistoric level, was a replacement from the arcade version. There are some other alterations that seem to me like the developers were going for a mixture of the arcade original and the SNES classic. If you haven&#039;t played both, or only played the SNES version then you&#039;ll likely miss out on the mix&#039;n&#039;match. That being said, I&#039;m still happy to be upset by this remake. I&#039;d rather have seen an Arcade port or an SNES port maybe a tweak to the graphics, but not this complete overhaul. Meh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t have anything to say to this other than I totally agree. I guess in a world where everything is getting remade or &#8220;rebooted,&#8221; I&#8217;ve finally come across a title that&#8217;s near and dear to my (as well as a lot of gamers) heart. I played through to the prehistoric level to fight the gelatinous creature instead of Slash and was immediately turned off. Now, having done some research, I discovered that the SNES version that I grew up playing was actually pretty radically different from the Arcade Version, which I never had the chance to play. Turns out, Slash, the boss from the prehistoric level, was a replacement from the arcade version. There are some other alterations that seem to me like the developers were going for a mixture of the arcade original and the SNES classic. If you haven&#8217;t played both, or only played the SNES version then you&#8217;ll likely miss out on the mix&#8217;n'match. That being said, I&#8217;m still happy to be upset by this remake. I&#8217;d rather have seen an Arcade port or an SNES port maybe a tweak to the graphics, but not this complete overhaul. Meh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

